Visit Our
Family Law Site
Click Here
This article aims to shed some light on the very recent labor law & Casual Workers Right decided by the Federal Court in relation to casual employees and casual workers. It is a major development with far implications for both employers and employees. As casual employees, you need to get this Casual worker Right. We […]
This article aims to shed some light on the very recent labor law & Casual Workers Right decided by the Federal Court in relation to casual employees and casual workers. It is a major development with far implications for both employers and employees. As casual employees, you need to get this Casual worker Right.
We suggest that you contact us to see if you have an arguable case to claim your rights.
The Full Court of the Federal Court in the landmark case of WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84 (20 May 2020) said that Mr. Rossato who was a mine casual worker was entitled to be paid annual leave, paid personal/carer’s leave, paid compassionate leave as well as payment for public holidays. The ruling found that Mr. Rossato under each of his six contracts was other than a casual employee for the purposes of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the FW Act) and not a casual Field Team Member under the 2012 EA.
Workplace argued that Mr. Rossato could not make claims with respect to paid annual leave, personal/carer’s leave, and compassionate leave entitlements under the National Employment Standards because he was a casual employee within the meaning of ss 86, 95, and 106 of The FW Act or, as a casual employee, claim payment for public holidays under s 116 of that Act. The Court disagreed.
The Federal Court further found that WorkPac was not entitled to bring into account the casual loading payments as part of the remuneration that it had made to Mr. Rossato on the basis that he was a casual employee. That is because the purposes of the payments of remuneration did not have a close correlation to the entitlements that Mr. Rossato seeks.
We are of the view that it does.
The simple translation of the ruling is that— an employer cannot assume that a casual employee as defined in the employment agreement can remain as casual, while at the same time be committed to a set of repeating roasters set in advance for a year, yet being deprived of the entitlements that Mr. Rossato is now being able to enjoy.
To answer this question, we need to examine your employment contract. Then we need to further examine whether you fall within the following criteria bearing in mind that the list is not exhaustive–
Yes, you may—providing you qualify as a casual employee as defined by the Court ruling.
No–this is because as part of the ruling, the employer is not entitled to the restitution of the casual loading which may have been included in your hourly rate and paid to you before.
No—providing that your employment contract falls within the ambit of the ruling.
It is estimated that there are about 2.6 million casual employees in Australia out of which 1.6 million work as casual employees on a regular and ongoing basis.
MORE INFO (External) http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FCAFC//2020/84.html